Mehra & Sons

Arre O Sambha, Kitne Prompts The?

Do sau, sarkar. Aur phir bhi compile nahi hua.

Old dog. New tricks. Two hundred prompts.

Sachin Mehra · November 2026 · 9 min read

A board of newspaper clippings from Sachin Mehra's career, including a 1995 Financial Express story titled Cyber Surfing, a Convergence Q&A, and his 2015 LinkedIn articles.
Thirty years in newsprint. My wife and sons had this board made for my birthday this year. She had quietly kept every clipping, some from before we were married. I'd assumed she stopped reading my quotes around 1998. Turns out she was just filing them.

In 1991 I wrote programs in LISP. For the uninitiated, LISP was the language of artificial intelligence, back when AI meant a professor, a chalkboard, and a machine the size of a Maruti 800 that could, on a good day, tell a cat from a chair. AI and I go back thirty-five years. It just took that long to return my call.

In between, my career became a list of firsts: India's first public Internet access, its first fibre to the building, the first Indian customer for Juniper's M20. Then I built one of the only carrier-class routers to come out of India, and the telecom software systems that run alongside it. I've written about that past, twice, in 2015.

This piece is about now, and what's next. Because at fifty-four, with no code written since the Vajpayee government, I went back to building. And I learned that old dogs don't just learn new tricks. We learn them faster, because we already know which tricks matter.

Kitne Prompts The?

It started with a decree. AI coding tools, mandatory, effective immediately. Twenty engineers said yes sir, then did what Indian teams have done to decrees since the Mughals. They waited for me to forget.

They weren't lazy. They were frightened. Every headline said AI would replace programmers, and here was the boss beaming like a man who had just found a cheaper one. No decree was going to fix that. So I decided to show the younglings by example.

Then Claude did something I hadn't planned for. It took the syntax off my hands entirely. I didn't stop coding twenty-five years ago because I stopped loving the problems. I stopped because I couldn't stand the semicolons. Now the semicolons were someone else's job. What was left was the algorithm, the trade-off, the shape of the solution. The part I'd always been good at. The part I'd been paying other people to do.

Old Dogs Have Dug Trenches

Here's what Gen Z brings: fluency. They were born with a model in their pocket. Here's what they don't bring, yet: not one of them has built a router, dug a trench, or pointed a satellite dish at the right bit of sky.

The first horizontal directional drilling machine in India was a Ditch Witch, and it was mine to command. We bored a fibre route from Nehru Place to Okhla Phase 3 overnight, under the road, without opening a single trench. The right of way cost us one rupee. I have never closed a better deal, and I've closed a few.

I've dug trenches for fibre, laid submarine cable, hung off poles pulling coax for cable TV and DOCSIS, built metro Ethernet, and watched ATM, WiMAX and TDM rise, strut, and die. I saw GSM lift whole countries. I've worked on MCU, CPU, ASIC, FPGA, NPU and now GPU, from when NVIDIA was a graphics card company. I sold TCP/IP stacks from FTP Software when the Internet was a university hobby, and distributed RSA tokens when public-key encryption was considered exotic. I've fought cyber attacks. I remember when any .com you wanted was available. And I'm scratching the surface.

None of that is nostalgia. It's the brief. Every scar is a thing I know the customer will complain about before they do. When knowledge is democratised, the only thing left to sell is judgment, and judgment is made of scar tissue. White hair, for once, is a feature.

Driving Lessons at 54

Learning this at fifty-four is like getting back behind the wheel after twenty-five years of being chauffeured. You know every shortcut in Delhi. You have opinions about the route. You just can't remember which side the indicator is on, and the car keeps telling you off.

My first mistake was treating the model like a colleague with a memory. I'd spend an evening with it designing a module, go to bed pleased with myself, and come back the next morning to find it had no idea who I was or what we'd agreed. Like a brilliant consultant who bills you for the briefing every single day. I blamed the model. I switched models, three times. The models were fine. The problem was that in twenty-three years of running a company on verbal instructions, I had never written anything down, and a machine was the first employee to call me on it. Now every project has a one-page note: who we are, what's decided, what never to do. The team, it turns out, had wanted that note for years.

My second mistake was assuming our own data was clean. I set a model loose on two decades of customer records we were moving off a rented platform, expecting a tidy migration. Within minutes it reported, politely, that we had sold several devices in the year 2103. A typo, repeated across a batch, that had sat in our systems for a decade. Nobody had noticed. Nobody had looked. That's when I understood what these things are good for: not replacing judgment, but applying it tirelessly, to every row, at three in the morning.

And somewhere past midnight, looking at something that actually worked, I caught myself grinning. The boy with the LISP manual had never left. He'd been stuck in a very long board meeting.

Horses for Courses

People ask which AI models and tools I use. It's the wrong question, the way asking a builder which brand of hammer he swings is the wrong question. He owns several. What matters is knowing which one the job in front of him needs. So, horses for courses.

The frontier models I use mostly to stay abreast. Fable and Opus when I'm thinking about architecture. Sonnet for the grind. Gemini, Kimi K3 and Astra to keep the others honest. I've tried every one with a name. Don't marry a model. Date them all, and keep notes.

Anything that must stay on the device or on the premises runs on Ollama with Qwen. In my business, with government and railway customers, that's most of it. A sovereign network cannot phone California to ask whether a port should be open.

Sitting between all of them is LiteLLM, a switchboard. Every request goes through it, and it decides which model picks up: the expensive one for a design question, a cheap local one for a lookup. It caches prompts so the same context isn't paid for twice, and it keeps the bill. My token spend dropped the month I installed it, which is more than I can say for any consultant I've hired.

LangChain is the plumbing for anything that takes more than one step: fetch the logs, summarise them, check the summary against the manual, draft the reply, ask a human before sending. A language model answers a question. LangChain turns a dozen answers into a job that finishes.

And AnythingLLM gave me what the industry calls RAG, retrieval-augmented generation. In plain words: before the model answers, it goes and reads the relevant pages first. I fed it twenty-three years of support tickets, manuals and field notes, and now a new engineer can ask “why does this gateway reboot at 2 a.m. on Tuesdays” and get the answer we wrote down in 2011, with the ticket number. The model didn't learn our business. It learned where we keep it.

Then there are the vision models. Moondream is small enough to run at the edge and look at a camera feed, which means every CCTV camera on the premises is now a sensor with opinions. I've built useful things with it. I've also built a thoroughly shameless thing: it watches our cameras and pings me when an employee appears to be wasting time. The employees have asked that it be pointed at my office.

We're discussing it.

And here's the part the hype merchants miss. Most of a network's intelligence should not be a language model at all. Deciding a channel, steering a client, spotting an anomaly: that's statistics and signal processing. Deterministic, explainable, cheap. The language model talks. The maths from the 1940s decides.

That's how we rebuilt the data planes for our MSG gateway and BNG line this year. Agents on the typing, maths on the decisions, me on the judgment. The CEO who enters one horse in every race is going to lose a lot of races.

Just Converse, and It's Done

All of that was practice for Udaya (dawn, in Sanskrit), the company my sons and I are building, and its product, Udaya Intelligence. I can't say much yet. I can say this.

For thirty years, fixing a network meant a man, a laptop, a ladder, and a command line only he understood. We built a crew instead. Kato fronts the conversation; he's named for Inspector Clouseau's manservant in the Pink Panther films, who attacks the moment you walk in the door to keep you sharp. Bandit prices the risk. Markov projects what the network will look like after. Q runs the tools. A real exchange, lightly staged:

Chat with Kato, the Udaya Intelligence assistant. User: Kato, the conference room Wi-Fi dies every day around eleven. Kato: It isn't dying, it's being bullied. Three access points on one channel, and the pantry microwave joins in at lunch. I've drafted the fix. Approve? User: Approve. Kato: Scheduled for 2 a.m. Nothing touches an access point until then.
Kato, Udaya Intelligence beta. No ladder to climb, no command line to learn.

No ladder to climb. No command line. Approved, scheduled, done. Udaya is building the devices and the systems behind them so that a network explains itself in plain language, proposes its own fixes, and waits for a yes. The box is still there. Nobody will buy the box. They'll buy what it knows.

That's the sneak peek. The rest launches soon, and I'm wary of being too helpful to people treading the same path.

What I See Next

In April I wrote about the Holy Trinity: AI, then quantum, then fusion, each one unlocking the next. Underneath it was one question, and it's the question that made me change everything.

What will you do in a world where knowledge is democratised, compute is limitless, and energy is free?

Not in fifty years. Soon enough that the plan has to start now. So I rearranged my life around it. Inventum is an Anthropic Partner, a twenty-three-year-old Indian telecom equipment and software systems company in official partnership with one of the world's leading AI labs. I advise the board of Classiq, a quantum computing software company, and understand perhaps eleven percent of what's said in those meetings. They know. I believe they keep me for the anecdotes. And I co-chair OpenWiFi and OpenLAN at the Telecom Infra Project, where a seat at the global standards table turned out to have been available all along. You just had to keep showing up.

From that seat, with my usual record of being early enough to look wrong:

Knowledge stops being the moat. Judgment is. When everyone can know everything, the scarce thing is knowing which problem is worth solving. That comes from having been wrong enough times to recognise the shape of right.

The excuse is gone. In 2015 I complained that India couldn't build world-class intellectual property: no risk capital, no patience, a services mindset. Well. The fifty-dollar-an-hour gravy train that funded that mindset has just been derailed by the one thing it was too cautious to build. The services majors will have to rethink their business model. The rest of us finally get to build one. The cost of building just collapsed. A profitable twenty-person company in Delhi can now out-imagine a division of Cisco. The only thing stopping Indian founders from owning IP is Indian founders.

The CEO who can't brief an agent will soon report to one who can. And briefing is not typing. It's giving the machine the right context: the customer who will complain, the shortcut that blew up in 2009, the thing the manual doesn't say. In other words, the scar tissue. That's not a threat. It's a job description, and old dogs are unusually qualified for it.

Picture Abhi Baaki Hai

Then my sons came home. Berkeley and Tufts, good jobs in San Francisco, and both chose to co-found Udaya with me. I didn't ask. I had to sell them the plan like any other investor, and justify what it would cost them in salary and opportunity. They did the maths. I'm choosing to believe the maths won, and not their mother's food.

So now three Mehras sit at one table building the same thing. Two grew up with models. One grew up with LISP and a modem that screamed like a kettle. They say I talk to Kato like it's a 1995 ISD call, shouting, and counting the seconds. I say they've never fixed anything without a chatbot holding their hand. We're both right, and we've decided to fight about it in public.

Coming soon: Mehra & Sons. Their side. I'm told I won't enjoy it.

In 2015 I asked who was listening to the little guys at home. In 2026 the little guy has a keyboard, a crew, two sons, and no excuses left. Knowledge is democratised. Compute and energy are on their way.

So. Fellow old dogs.
What will you do?


For readers outside India: the title is from Sholay (1975), the film every Indian over forty can quote from memory, the way Americans quote The Godfather. It ran in one Mumbai cinema for five years. Its villain, Gabbar Singh, asks his henchman Sambha how many men went out. “Two, sir.” Two, against three farmers, and you came back empty-handed? Replace men with prompts and you have my year.

Full disclosure: I still run Inventum, an Indian telecom equipment and software systems company and an Anthropic Partner. I co-founded Udaya with my sons, advise the board of Classiq, and co-chair OpenWiFi and OpenLAN at the Telecom Infra Project. The views are mine. The typos are the model's. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

Join the conversation: Comment on LinkedIn X @sachinmehra